Monday, October 9, 2017

The Gretamorphosis by Franz Kafka, a novella characterized by slipstream fiction and absurdist narrative, originally published in 1915 under the title Der Verwandlung, in the country of Austria-Hungary which is now known as the Czech Republic after its dissolution in 1918.

this is posted on monday so kinda spoiler alert


In Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, Grete is the only other character mentioned by name (besides Anna the servant, who’s mentioned fleetingly); other unnamed characters include the father, mother, chief clerk guy, and the maid. This uniqueness reveals the significance of her character throughout the story, and specifically the growth, or evolution of her personality and role within the family.


While Gregor Samsa is undoubtedly the protagonist of Kafka’s story, the majority of character development is concentrated with Grete, and the focus of the narration entirely shifts during the third part. In the beginning, before Gregor opens the door, Grete knocks and asks: “Gregor? Aren’t you well? Is there anything you want?” and later whispers: “Do open up, Gregor, please do.” Grete clearly has a deferential and even subservient attitude towards Gregor based on this dialogue. Later in the story, she is called to run to the doctor, implying that the mother often has Grete do these menial chores which indicates her role in the family. Grete even breaks down sobbing when Gregor does not open the door at first. This shows that in the beginning of the story, Grete’s character is certainly fragile, and while I don’t want to characterize her as weak, it seems that Grete is described as a vulnerable, faint personality.


Once Gregor’s evolution into an insect happens, Grete has to take the responsibility of taking care of him, which is when her development starts. At first, she keeps the same timid attitude as before (you can’t really blame her, she’s dealing with a giant insect), but she ends up realizing that she has power over Gregor; this is exemplified in how Grete hands him the dirty dumpster scraps for meals, and also how Grete asserts her own opinion over her parents: “But unfortunately his sister thought otherwise; she had become accustomed, and not without some justification, to adopt with her parents the role of a special expert whenever Gregor’s affairs were being discussed.” Grete’s transformation is perhaps most succinctly explicated in this narrative description: “During the first two weeks his parents could not bring themselves to come in to him, and he often heard them expressing their full appreciation of his sister's present labours, whereas previously they had frequently become annoyed with her because she seemed to them a somewhat useless girl.” Grete’s change is almost drastic, in the way that Gregor’s transformation is sudden and dramatic.


We can view this progression relative to Gregor’s role in the family. He sees himself as the cornerstone or the centerpiece, directly responsible for maintaining his family’s survival. He’s pretty much correct: he’s the only one working to get rid of the family debt and putting food on the table. However, once Gregor becomes increasingly incapacitated, the family is left with no one to take care of them. This is where Grete evolves into a more assertive character: while she does not have a job, she takes on several responsibilities and voices her own opinions. In one scene, she is heard by Gregor as saying: “We must try to get rid of [Gregor]”. After he interrupts her violin playing and causes the lodgers to leave, she says: “If it were Gregor, he would have realized long since that it isn’t possible for human beings to live together with a creature like that, and he would have gone away of his own accord.” Her suddenly bold statements illustrate the pinnacle of her development: she puts the interest of her family ahead of her incapacitated brother, and becomes her own mature and responsible character.

Grete’s own metamorphosis makes Kafka’s story more interesting because it makes the reader more invested in the family, and it illustrates the law of conservation of character: as Gregor’s role becomes diminished, Grete’s responsibility within the family grows, and eventually she may be the cornerstone that Gregor once was. This leaves room for a possible sequel to The Metamorphosis; what happens to the family after the situation with Gregor, and how will Grete adapt?

Finally, what's your overall feeling after reading the story: do you feel sad for Gregor, or happy for the family?

12 comments:

  1. Kafka hints at your point at the end of the book. Without Gregor in the family, the core of the family and what they depend on has shifted to Grete. It is her responsibility now to take care of her family. In my opinion, the family has adapted well. In midst of the tough times having to deal with Gregor, the family has come together and relied on each other to support themselves. Each member has some type of role/job and their occupations have filled the enormous void Gregor has left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every author hints at things throughout the story. The point of the blog post was to elucidate the theme I found. I'll pose the question: is The Metamorphosis a story of tragedy, or is it a story of growth and character development?

      Delete
    2. It doesn't have to be a choice. I believe it's both a story of tragedy and a story of growth. While it's a tragedy because Gregor dies, it is his death that allows for a growth within a whole family.

      Delete
    3. I guess you could say that the theme of the book depends on which character's perspective you look from, but for a general story one would usually characterize it as one or the other. I'd argue that the novel is mainly from Gregor's point of view, so it makes more sense for it to be a tragedy. A normal reader would probably feel sympathetic for Gregor, but it's understandable if you didn't.

      Delete
    4. Alright, let's look at it from Gregor's perspective. Even so, Gregor sees an improved family. He realizes that, because of his absence, his family has steered themselves into the right direction. Looking at it from the perspectives of his family members, I can still see how it is a story of tragedy. It is them who actually have to go through the impact of Gregor's death. Gregor was their son! How would you feel if your son died? Isn't that tragic? What do you mean from Gregor's perspective it is tragedy. If anything, it's from the family's perspective in which is most depressing.

      Delete
    5. I think Gregor's perspective definitely offers more of a tragic perspective than the family's; he thinks that his death is tragic because from his point of view he is the cornerstone of the family, and how will they survive without him? It is true that the family develops after his death, but the narration at the end is not confirmed as Gregor's, and even so, Gregor feels his death is tragic because of his future inability to care for his family. Towards the end of the story, we can see that the family doesn't really grieve over the loss of their Gregor; during his time as an insect, they view him as a burden and literally a pest, and it seems that they don't give Gregor a second thought as they move away and start their new lives.

      Delete
  2. You make excellent points throughout this blog post about Grete's role in the story. Grete's transformation from a "faint personality" into a more assertive figure culminates in the Samsa parents taking their greatest pride in her at the end of the story. It seems like Gregor and Grete reverse their roles from the beginning and end of the story. Gregor was the one the family depended on until he turned into a dependent bug, while Grete essentially assumes Gregor's role as the pride of the family. I think that in this way Gregor and Grete both have significant character development. Overall, I feel sad for Gregor and feel little sympathy. This probably comes from my view of Gregor as a sentient person.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like the Story, your titles are absurd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a really good point about Grete. I have never actually thought about her changing only becoming more of an asshole. But after reading your blog, I realize that Grete has only become more mature, realistic, and aware her situation. She realized that in order to move forward, they have to get rid of Gregor, a tough decision an adult only makes.

      Delete
    2. I agree. His titles can sometimes be too much.

      Delete
  4. This point is very important, especially towards the end of the story, when Gregor is dead. As you said, she could become the family's support as Gregor once was. This is hinted too (quite strongly) at the very end when her parents see her as a shapely girl, fully capable of bringing home a husband (assumingly one with a good source of money, which can be contributed to partially [or wholey] by Grete). The parents want to take full advantage of Grete, just as they did with Gregor. The only trouble is that she is rather less slave-like and dutiful as he was.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You did a really good job at picking out the subtle metamorphoses happening around Gregor's own. It's interesting that everyone's metamorphoses aren't just happening as a result of inherent development, but instead as a direct result of Gregor's transformation. His sister is such a pivotal role- she even ends up more or less causing his death. I could honestly see Grete ending up with the same fate as Gregor. Perhaps not the insect part, but now that she's been consumed with responsibility and taking care of her family, I could see her ending up with her entire life being work. It's definitely interesting to think about. Great post!

    ReplyDelete